LazyApply Review 2025: Honest Ratings, User Feedback & Best Alternatives

08 May 2025
Lately, things haven’t been looking great for LazyApply. Even though it claims to send out hundreds of job applications a day, its Trustpilot rating is stuck at just 2.1 stars. Most users seem disappointed, with 52% giving it the lowest possible rating. A viral story about an unemployed person who supposedly secured 20 interviews after using this tool to apply for 5,000 jobs sounds impressive, but real user experiences suggest otherwise.
LazyApply's claim of submitting 750 daily applications through LinkedIn and Indeed sounds appealing, but user feedback raises serious doubts about its legitimacy. Some users raise red flags about application accuracy and the risk of getting their accounts flagged. The tool's ratings on other platforms look slightly better, with 3.4 stars on Chrome Web Store and 2.1 on TrustPilot. These numbers suggest that this quantity-focused approach might not be the best strategy for job seekers. Quality-focused alternatives offer better value than spending $99-$249 on LazyApply's lifetime access.
LazyApply’s Big Promise: What It Claims to Offer
LazyApply sells itself as a way to save time for job seekers who feel swamped by applications. The platform rests on three main selling points: automation tech, AI-powered documents, and a one-time payment system. But the reality behind these appealing promises needs a closer look.
Automation Across Major Job Boards
The main draw of LazyApply is its automated system that claims to submit hundreds of job applications for you. You can supposedly apply to up to 750 jobs per day across different platforms without much work. The automation works mainly on:
LinkedIn Jobs
Indeed
ZipRecruiter
Glassdoor
Monster
The platform also has a Chrome extension that works smoothly with these job boards. You can trigger mass applications while browsing. The tech matches keywords to find relevant positions and automatically fills in your profile info.
LazyApply also boasts "smart filtering" to target jobs matching your skills. But this filtering seems to just match basic keywords rather than truly understanding context like you might expect from a smart system.
However, when looking at customer reviews from the past 6 months, users mention that none of these automations actually work and that they haven’t been able to reach the LazyApply team either.
AI Resume and Cover Letter Tools
LazyApply extends its offering beyond simple automation with AI tools designed to enhance application materials. Here’s what the platform claims to provide:
Resume Enhancement: Identifies keywords from job descriptions and suggests modifications aimed at passing ATS (Applicant Tracking System) filters.
Cover Letter Generation: Produces basic cover letters for different jobs, using templates with limited personalization.
Profile Optimization: Offers tips to improve LinkedIn and professional profiles, although these suggestions are often generic and not tailored to specific industries.
In reality, LazyApply’s so-called “AI” tools seem quite basic. Users often report that the system behaves more like a set of static templates, offering minimal customization and little real value for standing out in competitive job markets.
Wobo AI takes a far more personalized and effective approach.
Thanks to the Wobo Persona, every resume and cover letter is fully customized to the individual user. Wobo’s AI Resume Builder and AI Cover Letter Generator don’t just sprinkle in keywords; they craft documents aligned with each user’s unique career history, skills, and job targets. This personalized approach helps create better applications that truly connect with recruiters and give candidates a real advantage.
Lifetime Pricing Model Explained
LazyApply uses a one-time payment model instead of subscriptions like its competitors. They offer three pricing tiers:
The Basic Plan costs $99 (lifetime) and gives you core automation features with 150 applications per day, plus basic resume analysis.
The Premium Plan runs $149 (lifetime) and lets you send 300 applications daily while adding cover letter creation.
Their Ultimate Plan costs $249 (lifetime) and removes daily application limits while giving you all AI features.
Each plan promises lifetime access with no recurring fees, which sounds better than subscription services. But "lifetime" means the product's life, not yours, something to think about since the service could close anytime.
So while a one-time payment might look good at first, it raises questions about future support and updates. Many users worry about paying a big fee upfront for a service that has mixed reviews and might not last.
Real User Experiences: What LazyApply Reviews Reveal
LazyApply's ambitious claims don't match the reality of disappointed users. A look at actual customer experiences reveals a huge gap between promises and delivery. This raises red flags for anyone who wants to use this job application tool.
Trustpilot Ratings and Common Complaints
LazyApply has earned a dismal 1.9/5 star rating on Trustpilot, while other sources show an equally poor 2.1/5. The ratings tell an interesting story - 52% of reviewers gave just 1 star, while 44% awarded 5 stars. These polarized numbers point to inconsistent performance.
The company's decision to rename its Trustpilot page to "PEVE VISIONS" (its parent company name) raises eyebrows. Many wonder if this move aims to hide negative reviews from search results. But afterward, the Trustpilot team reverted the name back to its original form.
Users who felt let down often mention these problems:
Applications sent to irrelevant positions (including internships instead of full-time roles)
Payment processing issues and unauthorized charges
The tool applies to nowhere near the advertised number of jobs
Poor form filling that could hurt application quality
A frustrated user put it this way: "Software is junk, applied for unrelated jobs, it was setting incorrect choices contrary to what I selected in the original interview".
Chrome Web Store and Reddit Feedback
Reviews on the Chrome Web Store paint a slightly better but still mediocre picture, with 3.6/5 stars from about 150 reviews. Yet this improved score masks many worrying reviews.
Reddit users share similar frustrations. Someone who tested LazyApply for several weeks said: "It works to an extent but don't expect too much of it or think it would be flawless". They noted that "it will make silly mistakes while filling up forms like inputting wrong information sometimes, or putting middle name even if you don't have a middle name".
The platform-specific issues bothered many Reddit users. While the LinkedIn plugin worked somewhat, Glassdoor "never worked," and the Indeed plugin "couldn't get past Indeed captcha and was never able to submit any jobs" Users also mentioned that the tool's AI capabilities "are not that good" and "it doesn't seem to learn much even after making changes.
Issues with Customer Support and Refunds
Customer support and refund problems are systemic. Users across platforms report being ignored after asking for help or refunds.
A lifetime membership buyer shared their experience: "After a few uses, it stopped functioning properly. Now, it just hangs on any site I try to use it with. I've reached out to customer support multiple times via email and even attempted to call through Skype, but I haven't received any response" [3].
Someone trying to get a refund described their frustration: "After numerous exchanges with Sajal, who repeatedly asked for information about my account that I had already provided, he ceased responding altogether after my last email" [3].
The Chrome Web Store's support section shows many unanswered refund requests. Users ask: "Not working on Indeed, how can we get a refund?" and "I have been trying for 3 hours. It doesn't work. Please help or give me my money back" [5].
A Reddit user summed it up clearly: "Once you buy its lifelong subscription, you can't get your money back either" [4]. This becomes a serious issue given the $99-$249 upfront cost for lifetime access.
Is LazyApply Legit or Just Overhyped?
A basic question lies at the heart of any LazyApply review: does this automation tool keep its promises or create more problems? Several serious concerns come to light after we dissected actual user experiences and platform policies that job seekers should think over.
Automation Errors and Application Mistakes
LazyApply's automated system makes errors that can hurt your job prospects directly. The tool made a serious error in one documented case by indicating a user spoke conversational Spanish when they didn't, which could misrepresent qualifications to employers [6]. The system has also input incorrect demographic information and reported one user as African American when they had specified Asian [6].
Users often report the tool making "silly mistakes while filling up forms." These include "inputting wrong information" and "putting middle name even if you don't have a middle name" [4]. Such errors aren't just minor issues - they represent major misrepresentations of your professional profile.
The most alarming issue is that LazyApply sometimes attaches wrong documents. A user found that there was an unrecognized document being used instead of their updated résumé [6]. Dozens of employers received applications with information meant for different companies.
Risk of Account Flags on LinkedIn and Indeed
Your professional accounts face risks when you use LazyApply. LinkedIn monitors suspicious activity, and real users report permanent restrictions for what appears as "fraudulent activity" [7]. Mass-applying behaviors can trigger these security measures and lock you out of vital networking platforms.
Indeed's terms of service state your license "automatically revokes upon your attempt to use the site for any other purpose" [8]. The platform doesn't act as an employment agency and "assumes no responsibility" for applications submitted through unauthorized means [8]. Using automation tools breaks platform policies.
Quantity Over Quality Problem
LazyApply's approach goes against effective job-search strategies. Indeed's data shows that "people with the highest number of applications are 39% less likely to receive a positive response from employers" [9].
High-volume application strategies often fail for several reasons:
Employers spot candidates who haven't read job descriptions right away [9]
Quality applications need about 2.5 hours of preparation each [10]
Mass applications include irrelevant positions [11]
Automated tools focus on "Easy Apply" positions that are usually "lower-paying, entry-level, or even worse, designed to collect your data" [12]. This volume-based approach hurts your job search by wasting time on wrong positions while risking your account status.
Wobo AI: A Smarter Alternative to LazyApply
Wobo AI stands out as a sophisticated alternative to LazyApply's problematic approach by putting quality before quantity. This AI-powered job search assistant works like your personal recruiter and provides a smarter solution in today's competitive job market.
Personalized AI Job Search with Wobo
Wobo's unique Persona technology makes it highly effective. It creates an accurate digital version of your professional profile and matches you with ideal job opportunities based on your skills and priorities. Wobo builds a complete picture of your career goals and qualifications, unlike LazyApply's simple keyword matching. You'll only see positions that truly match your profile.
Daily Market Scanning for Fresh Opportunities
The platform scans the job market every day to find positions that match your criteria. The system focuses on active openings at top companies, startups, and Fortune 500 firms that fit your goals perfectly. You won't waste time on irrelevant listings or spam opportunities - a frequent complaint from LazyApply users.
AI Job Application Bot
The AI job application bot saves you hours by submitting applications automatically. The system customizes responses to showcase your most relevant skills, which gives you an advantage over generic applications. Wobo's advanced AI analyzes job descriptions and potential AI traps carefully. Your applications will have accurate and relevant answers - an area where LazyApply users often struggle.
AI Resume Builder and AI Cover Letter Generator
The platform has powerful document creation tools that boost your applications:
An AI Resume Builder that creates modern, ATS-friendly resumes optimized for specific job descriptions
An AI Cover Letter Generator that writes unique, tailored letters for each position instead of generic templates
These tools were developed with direct input from hiring managers in various industries. They produce authentic content that highlights your unique qualifications - much better than LazyApply's simple templating approach. Users report more interviews and better employer responses compared to quantity-focused alternatives.
Wobo AI Reviews
LazyApply vs Wobo AI: Which One Is Worth Your Time?
LazyApply and Wobo AI take very different paths to help you land your next job. These platforms show two distinct ways of thinking about how job hunting should work.
Feature Comparison
Many “Easy Apply” job listings on major platforms are either low-quality, outdated, or even fake, designed more to collect user data than to offer real employment opportunities. Tools like LazyApply, which automate mass applications to these listings, often waste users’ time and risk exposing their personal information. Users frequently report issues such as “couldn’t get past Indeed captcha” or “Glassdoor never worked,” and LazyApply is limited to only a few platforms, like LinkedIn, Indeed, ZipRecruiter, Glassdoor, and Monster. But when looking at customer reviews from the past 6 months, users mention that none of these automations actually work and that they haven’t been able to reach the LazyApply team either.
Wobo AI takes a completely different, and far superior, approach.
Rather than blindly applying to questionable listings, Wobo creates a detailed user persona, a digital twin built from your background, experience, and career aspirations. Acting as a personal AI recruiter, Wobo continuously scans the broader job market daily, focusing exclusively on high-quality companies and verified roles. It doesn’t just submit applications; it intelligently targets the best-fit opportunities and customizes each application for maximum impact.
LazyApply is merely a form-filler automating volume.
Wobo AI is a smart career partner, helping you secure real opportunities that align with your true potential.
User Experience and Success Rates
The numbers tell a clear story. A LazyApply user sent out about 5,000 applications and got just 20 interviews—that's a 0.5% success rate [13]. Users often complain about the Chrome extension. They say it "makes major mistakes" and comes with "no free trial".
Wobo takes time to showcase what makes you special to employers, which leads to more interviews. This AI assistant handles everything while keeping standards high. It targets jobs at top tech companies and startups like Tesla, OpenAI, SpaceX, and Reddit [12].
You can check Wobo reviews for success stories.
Pricing and Value for Money
LazyApply's one-time payment options include:
Basic Plan: $99.00 lifetime access with 150 daily applications
Premium Plan: $129.00 lifetime access with 750 daily applications
Unlimited Plan: $249.00 lifetime access with unlimited applications
The lifetime pricing might look good at first glance. Yet many users wonder if it's worth paying anything at all given how poorly it performs. One user puts it this way: "Some LazyApply users think the price is well worth the service, while others don't think the service works well enough for any price".
Wobo's pricing reflects its advanced AI tools, customized approach, and proven track record. This makes it a better choice for anyone serious about their job search.
Conclusion
LazyApply raises serious concerns that job seekers should not ignore. With a poor 2.1-star TrustPilot rating, users frequently report critical issues like application errors, incorrect form submissions, and even account flagging risks. Many who paid $99–$249 for lifetime access also struggle to get proper customer support or refunds, adding to their frustration.
The platform’s core flaw lies in its emphasis on quantity over quality. Mass applying to hundreds of jobs daily might feel like progress when you’re under pressure, but it often backfires. Research shows that candidates who take the mass-application route are 39% less likely to receive interview callbacks. In this sense, LazyApply’s main selling point actually undermines your job search success.
Wobo AI offers a far smarter and more effective alternative.
Rather than flooding employers with generic applications, Wobo acts as a true AI-powered personal recruiter. It carefully builds a customized user persona, scans the entire job market for high-quality, verified opportunities, and crafts tailored application materials that align with each role’s specific requirements. Wobo’s quality-driven system not only increases the chances of landing interviews but also ensures your applications resonate with hiring managers.
The difference is clear: LazyApply gives you numbers , Wobo delivers real opportunities.
When your career future is at stake, choosing a tool that prioritizes quality, personalization, and strategic action, like Wobo, can mean the difference between endless rejections and real career growth.
FAQs
Q1. Is LazyApply worth the investment for job seekers?
LazyApply's value is questionable. While it promises to automate hundreds of job applications daily, user reviews indicate mixed results. Many report issues with application accuracy and potential risks to professional accounts. Consider alternatives that focus on quality over quantity for better job search outcomes.
Q2. How does LazyApply compare to other AI job application bots?
LazyApply primarily focuses on mass applications across major job boards. However, more sophisticated alternatives like Wobo AI offer personalized job matching, comprehensive market scanning, and tailored application materials. These advanced features tend to yield higher success rates in landing interviews and job offers.
Q3. What are the main risks of using LazyApply?
The primary risks include potential errors in application submissions, misrepresentation of qualifications, and the possibility of having your accounts flagged on platforms like LinkedIn and Indeed. Additionally, the quantity-over-quality approach may actually decrease your chances of receiving positive responses from employers.
Q4. Can LazyApply really help me apply to 750 jobs per day?
While LazyApply claims to enable up to 750 daily applications, user experiences suggest this number is often unrealistic. Many report the tool applying to far fewer jobs than advertised, with some features not working consistently across all supported job boards.
Q5. What should I consider before purchasing a LazyApply lifetime subscription? Before investing in a LazyApply lifetime subscription, consider the mixed user reviews, potential risks to your professional profiles, and the lack of long-term support guarantees. Also, evaluate whether a mass application strategy aligns with effective job search practices recommended by career experts.
Q6: What’s the best alternative to LazyApply?
If you’re looking for a smarter alternative to LazyApply, Wobo is the clear choice for serious job seekers. Unlike LazyApply, which simply auto-fills mass applications to “Easy Apply” listings, many of which are low-quality, outdated, or even fake, Wobo takes a quality-first approach. It builds a detailed user persona using your background, experience, and career goals, and acts as a personal AI recruiter. Instead of sending generic applications in bulk, Wobo carefully analyzes the job market daily and applies only to high-quality, verified roles that are a strong fit. It also creates customized resumes and cover letters for each opportunity, dramatically increasing your chances of getting noticed. While LazyApply emphasizes quantity, Wobo focuses on personalization, strategic targeting, and long-term career growth, making it the best alternative for anyone tired of wasting time on mass-apply tools that rarely deliver real results.
References
[3] - https://www.trustpilot.com/review/lazyapply.com
[4] - https://www.reddit.com/r/jobs/comments/zmuies/does_lazyapply_app_worth/
[5] - https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/lazyapply-job-application/pgnfaifdbfoiehcndkoeemaifhhbgkmm/support
[6] - https://www.businessinsider.com/job-applications-hiring-ai-bots-spam-resume-cover-letter-2024-3
[7] - https://www.linkedin.com/posts/valeriaaguerri_i-got-banned-from-linkedin-heres-what-activity-7193955296329748480-oFrG
[8] - https://www.indeed.com/legal
[9] - https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/finding-a-job/quality-vs-quantity-applications
[10] - https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/quality-quantity-your-job-applications-james-kingham
[11] - https://iesemba.com/2023/11/i-tested-lazyapply-the-bot-that-applies-to-jobs-automatically/
[12] - https://www.wobo.ai/blog/automated-ai-job-search-tool-comparison/
[13] - https://futurism.com/the-byte/unemployed-man-ai-apply-5000-jobs-gets-20-interviews
